Plus: the original luddites, Trump's Saudi deal, and Eminem.

View this email in your browser   

đź‘‹  Was this forwarded to you? Sign up here to get Today, Explained daily.

A man holding a US and Israel flag together on the same banner.

Probal Rashid/LightRocket via Getty Images

In today’s edition, we run down the biggest headlines of the afternoon, unspool when and why Democrats soured on Israel, and embrace an easy — dare I say, fun? — way to cut back on social media. Have thoughts or feelings on what you read here? You can reach me directly by email. I’m at caitlin.dewey@voxmedia.com.

Caitlin Dewey, senior writer

 

Caitlin Dewey, senior writer

 

 

During his campaign to become mayor of New York, Zohran Mamdani famously vowed that he’d arrest Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu the next time he visited the Big Apple.

This week, Netanyahu essentially called his bluff. He’s expected to address the United Nations in September. And after a whole lot of hemming, and hawing, and hedging, Mamdani admitted in a video Tuesday night that he does not actually have the legal authority to arrest a foreign dignitary on US soil.

The retreat is not surprising to legal experts, who had long questioned how Mamdani would pull this particular promise off. In November 2024, the International Criminal Court — a tribunal recognized by 125 countries, not including Israel, China, Russia, or the US — did issue an arrest warrant for Netanyahu on charges of starvation, murder, persecution, and intentionally directing attacks against civilians.

But the US does not recognize the ICC’s jurisdiction. And even if it did, the job of executing its warrants would presumably not fall to New York City cops. So, why did Mamdani suggest he’d arrest Netanyahu when he actually knew he could not?

 

The end of the pro-Israel consensus

Mamdani’s allies argue that the principle here mattered — that the mayor needed to issue some kind of denunciation, even if he couldn’t act. But there’s another, more cynical read here, too: For Democrats, critiquing Israel is good politics.

 

This is a seismic, generational shift, with far-ranging implications for both Democrats and US foreign policy. The party’s left flank has criticized Israel for years, but older and more moderate Dems only soured on Israel recently.

 

“A few months after October 7, younger and progressive Democrats overwhelmingly took the opinion that Israel was committing a genocide,” said Hamid Bendaas, of the Institute for Middle East Understanding, a pro-Palestinian advocacy group. “But there were still elements of the Democratic Party — people watching MSNBC or NPR — that weren’t convinced.”

 

For many of these voters, the turning point only came after President Donald Trump took office again. Severe famine swept across Gaza last summer — the consequence of ongoing conflict and Israeli restrictions on food and aid shipments. Netanyahu also allied himself closely with Trump, particularly around the war in Iran. Support for Israel has consequently grown more GOP-coded, rather like Kid Rock or Bass Pro hats.

 

Now, even Democrats far to the right of Mamdani are looking to retool the US-Israeli relationship. Listen to Tuesday’s Today, Explained podcast episode for even more about the shift (!).

 
 
Learn more about OpenWeb
 
  • Saudi deal: President Donald Trump says Saudi Arabia must normalize relations with Israel for a US nuclear deal to move forward, adding a new condition to the agreement.
  • Market jitters: Stocks dropped Thursday as escalating Middle East tensions pushed oil prices higher and raised fears about the global economy.
  • On the podcast: Ticks are exponentially expanding their territory, using us for their next blood meal. We must fight back. Listen to the whole thing here.

Enjoying Today, Explained?

Your membership funds the reporting behind this newsletter. If you read us regularly, it’s the best way to keep it going.

BECOME A MEMBER

➨ Beat the endless scroll at its own game. Social media is compelling — and compulsive — because it hijacks your sense of curiosity. But my colleague Constance Grady has come up with a delightful (and delightfully simple) antidote: To reclaim your time, just find the thing that fascinates you even more than your feed.

 
  • Did you know…that the term “Luddite” comes from a movement of skilled, 19th-century textile workers who smashed and burned automated looms?
  • Today’s trivia: The city of Enid, Oklahoma, is named after a character from which Victorian literary work? (You can find this and other brain puzzles in Vox’s daily crossword. Look for the answer in tomorrow’s edition.)
  • Yesterday’s trivia: Yesterday I messed up! I told you that there were 23 countries in Latin America, when there are in fact 23 countries in North America. (I think we can all agree that the latter makes for more surprising trivia.) I also asked you for the name of the Eminem song that gave us the slang term for an obsessive admirer. That would be “Stan.” It also samples Dido.

Today’s edition was produced and edited by me, Caitlin Dewey. Thanks for reading! 

 

Have thoughts or feelings on what you read here? You can reach me directly by email. I’m at caitlin.dewey@voxmedia.com.

 
 
Learn more about OpenWeb
 
FacebookTwitterYouTubeInstagram TikTokWhatsApp

This email was sent to example@example.com. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work by becoming a Vox Member.

 

View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service.

 

Vox Media, 1701 Rhode Island. NW, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2026. All rights reserved.