Hey readers,
Kenny here.
More than one in 10 Americans rely on the Colorado River to take showers and drink clean water. But with no end in sight to the decades-long drought in the western US and rapidly decreasing river levels, this essential resource is fueling bitter disputes over who, exactly, should be cutting back on water. This fight has been coming to a head especially among the seven states that make up the Colorado River Compact — California, Arizona, Colorado, Utah, Nevada, New Mexico, and Wyoming — as well as a sliver of Mexico and over 20 tribal nations that rely on the 1.9 trillion gallons of water pulled from the Colorado River for use each year. Record low snowfall in the West this winter has further strained the situation, and this week, tensions are running especially high.
The Colorado River Compact states failed to reach a Valentine’s Day deadline for a deal on how water would be apportioned for the next two decades, with the current rules set to expire this fall. If the states don’t agree to more ambitious cuts soon, the federal government could step in and unilaterally decide for them.
But it’s unclear exactly what that future would look like. Last year, the US Department of the Interior published a proposal with five potential options for the river’s future. Most involve a mix of voluntary and mandated water usage cuts, while another — fairly dire — option is “no action” at all.
The ongoing and escalating water crunch has inspired localities throughout the West to creatively conserve water through water recycling programs, ripping out grass lawns, and hiking rates when households use water in excess. But ultimately, if the Colorado River has any chance at sustaining tens of millions of Americans for decades to come, the western United States will need to do something that, on the surface, doesn’t seem to have much to do with water conservation at all: raise a lot fewer cows.
The Colorado River is running dry to feed cows
When we think about water use, we probably think of ourselves first — the water we drink, the toilets we flush, or the lawns we tend. Next, we might think of commercial uses, like water to irrigate golf courses and run car washes; or on an even larger scale, water used for fracking or operating power plants. But the biggest user of water, by far — especially among the Colorado River states — is agriculture. Farming accounts for about 75 percent of annual Colorado River water usage, according to a 2024 paper published in the journal Nature Communications Earth & Environment.
But not all agricultural sectors are equally thirsty. While a small share of the Colorado River water is used on farms to grow fruits and vegetables, like lettuce, oranges, and grapes, almost half of it — by far the lion’s share — is used to grow just alfalfa and other types of hay, virtually all of which is used to feed beef and dairy cattle.
|
Portions of the other crops grown with Colorado River water, like corn, wheat, cotton, sorghum, and oats, are likely fed to livestock, too.
All told, animal feed accounts for at least 47 percent of all water pulled from the Colorado River — yet the imprudence of devoting so much water to one industry receives little to no attention in public discussion over the West’s water crisis.
What’s more, the millions of cows in the American West are themselves fueling climate change in a non-insignificant way with their methane-rich burps, which in turn accelerates the water shortages for the river. |
Bill & Brigitte Clough/Design Pics Editorial/Universal Images Group via Getty Images |
And these crops provide little economic activity to the region. For example, almost 70 percent of all of Utah’s water is used to grow alfalfa, though it represents just 0.2 percent of the state’s GDP. As I wrote a few years ago: “The West’s already limited water is primarily used to grow a low-value crop, alfalfa, while cities are left to spend heavily on water-saving infrastructure to keep the H2O running and ensure reserves.” Yet few politicians — or us, the consumers of burgers, cheese, and steaks — are willing to question the status quo of ceding so much of this shared and increasingly sparse natural resource to the cattle industry. The uncertain future of the West’s water supply
If policymakers and agricultural researchers were to start our food system from scratch, they probably wouldn’t put a bunch of cows in the desert.
Despite the problems the West’s large cow population has created, policymakers also can’t just pull them off the land or rip alfalfa plants from the soil. Or turn off the spigots for, either. That’s because in the American West, water rights are set by what’s called the “prior appropriation” doctrine — whoever uses the water first lays claim to those rights and holds them indefinitely so long as they use the water.
California farmers were among the first to claim these rights in the mid- and late-1800s in the wake of the 1862 Homestead Act, which gave Western settlers free land to cultivate. Today, senior water rights holders are given priority, by law, over more junior water rights holders. (In the eastern US, where water is more plentiful, water rights are more egalitarian.) |
Marli Miller/UCG/Universal Images Group via Getty Images |
“It is a stupid system, but the problem is that people are really heavily invested in that system,” John Matthews, executive director of the nonprofit Alliance for Global Water Adaptation, told me a few years back. There are some potential solutions, such as paying farmers to fallow their fields and allowing more farmers to sell or lease their water rights to municipalities.
While farms across the Colorado River Compact have innovated to cut water use and waste, they’re still the biggest H2O guzzler by far. One California irrigation district dominated by alfalfa crops for cattle alone uses more water than all of Colorado uses for everything.
In current negotiations, the Lower Basin states — California, Arizona, and Nevada — have all committed to significant cuts. But the Upper Basin states — Colorado, Utah, New Mexico, and Wyoming — have refused to commit to such reductions, arguing that California and Arizona have long overconsumed water. The stalemate shows no signs of resolving soon.
Such battles over water in the West have been playing out for more than a century, and it’s all but certain they’ll continue, especially in the increasingly parched decades ahead. That is, unless policymakers — along with food companies and we consumers — address the cow in the room and challenge our meat- and dairy-centric status quo.
In the meantime, people living in the West will continue to be told to remove their grass lawns and take shorter showers while largely symbolic scapegoats like golf courses and data centers will take the fall for the real source of the West’s water crisis: ranchers, dairy producers, and their millions and millions of cows.
|
|
|
| Kenny Torrella Senior reporter, Future Perfect |
|
|
|
Kenny Torrella Senior reporter, Future Perfect |
|
|
| The Gray Area: Now twice as gray! |
The Gray Area with Sean Illing has expanded to twice a week. On Mondays and Fridays, we explore a question that matters — about democracy, identity, mental health, and the digital age. Listen wherever you get your podcasts.
|
|
|
CAN’T STOP THINKING ABOUT... |
|
|
| Title: Future Perfect fellow
What I cover: Global health, inequality, and philanthropy
What I’m learning on Duolingo: Chess and French (🔥1,067-day streak, baby) |
|
|
When I was about 10 years old, I helped my grandmother make a Facebook page. Her profile still credits her “fantastically amazing grandchild” for its provenance. But while some acquaintances still unknowingly wish her a happy birthday on her timeline each year, my grandmother — a once prolific poster and certified yapper — has not responded since 2016, when she passed away quite suddenly from complications of a blood disorder.
Facebook’s parent company Meta, through a recently filed patent, might be trying to change that. The patent gives Meta the exclusive, utterly dystopian right to use AI to “simulate” a user’s social media activity in the case of their long absence or death. Already, so-called “deadbots” — AI avatars of the deceased — have testified in murder trials and will probably hawk products soon. The digital afterlife industry — yes, this is a thing — is projected to quadruple in size to almost $80 billion over the next decade. And now Facebook presumably wants to cash in on it by artificially bringing users’ loved ones back from the dead to post. Can this possibly get even creepier or more vapid?
Look, I would give anything to talk to my grandmother again. Her vanity license plate — 1 JuJu (short for her name, Judy) — still sits on my windowsill, and even a decade after her death, I sometimes write her letters I can’t send. I don’t begrudge anyone for how they mourn, whether that’s an AI griefbot, a psychic medium, or a weaving circle. But I will begrudge anyone trying to profit off of the grief grift — and that’s sure what Meta sounds like it’s trying to do.
|
|
|
The Vox Membership program is getting even better with access to Vox’s Patreon, where members can unlock exclusive videos, livestreams, and chats with our newsroom.
Become a Vox Member to get access to it all. |
|
|
The deep roots of mutual aid |
How communities rally when the government fails them. |
In a world of endless GoFundMes and distant micro-donations, it’s never been easier to disburse assistance across the globe. These can absolutely provide life-changing help. But there are also immediate needs that often go overlooked not far from our own front door. And helping out a neighbor, it turns out, can be even more empowering.
This, I learned in a recent inspiring episode of Explain It to Me, is the power of mutual aid.
As host Jonquilyn Hill explains, mutual aid is a participatory form of assistance, rooted in community. It can be as simple as bringing a meal to a neighbor in a tight spot, hosting a free clothing swap, teaching someone else how to fix a bike, or running an errand for someone living in fear of immigration raids. And Hill’s guests explore the deep history of this tradition — including what it means to be an “auntie on the block” and how to think about aid as “solidarity, not charity.”
Mutual aid is especially essential when people feel the government isn’t providing support. And it might just make for more resilient communities in the long run. Plus, don’t miss the tips at the end about how to get started. — Katherine Courage, deputy editor, Future Perfect |
|
|
⭐ ONE WAY TO DO GOOD THIS WEEK |
The Milano-Cortina Winter Olympics ends this Sunday (boo!) after two-and-a-half weeks of all-you-can-watch speed skating, snowboarding, and luge. The Paralympics will be back with more next month, but in the interim, here are some ways to stay in the sporty spirit — and do some good!
If you want to make sure more athletes get the chance to compete, then consider donating to the Olympic Refuge Foundation, a group that supports athletes who’ve experienced displacement. There’s also the Challenged Athletes Foundation, which funds prosthetics and training for athletes with physical disabilities, and the Special Olympics, which offers opportunities for athletes with intellectual disabilities. You can also check out the laundry list of often sports-adjacent nonprofits founded by former Olympians and Paralympians themselves. Eleven-time Olympic medalist and maternal health advocate Allyson Felix has a group specifically dedicated to supporting parenting athletes.
And if the Olympics have you really feeling you’re in your jock era, then get out there and sign up for a charity run, volleyball tournament, or volunteer coaching gig. — Sara Herschander, Future Perfect fellow |
|
|
Want more Future Perfect in your inbox? Sign up for more newsletters here. Need advice? Submit a question to Sigal Samuel's advice column Your Mileage May Vary.
|
|
|
Today’s edition was edited by Paige Vega, Katie Courage, and Seth Maxon and produced by Seth. We’ll see you Wednesday! |
|
|
|
