Our 10 most read stories and holiday recommendations.

Hey readers,

It’s Bryan Walsh here. 

 

As Future Perfect has in past years, we’re calling out our most read stories of the year. It’s a great way to get a sense of the breadth of our coverage and the specific stories, authors, and subjects that you, our audience, found most engaging. 

 

In the list that follows, you’ll find classic Future Perfect stories and approaches, like Kelsey Piper’s cogent take on the question of whether masks were really effective during Covid-19, or Dylan Matthews’s story on the first results from the world’s biggest basic income experiment. But you’ll also find new subject areas we delved into in 2023, like Future Perfect fellow Oshan Jarow’s exploration of meditation or freelancer David Zipper’s article on how Norway is rethinking electric vehicles.

 

As I always am at this time of year, I’m incredibly proud of the work that Future Perfect has done and incredibly grateful for the attention and care of our audience — very much including all of the readers who respond to our newsletters. We’ll continue to grow in 2024 as we branch out into new areas while maintaining our focus on stories that are important, neglected, and tractable.

(Before we get started, a quick housekeeping note: We'll be off next week for the holidays. Keep an eye on your inbox in the new year!) 

 

1) “Why Norway — the poster child for electric cars — is having second thoughts” by David Zipper

 

One of the most important additions to Future Perfect in 2023 was deputy editor Marina Bolotnikova, who built out our network of outside contributors. So I was very happy to see a freelance piece as our most read story for the year. David Zipper, who writes widely about transportation and urban issues, went to Norway and found that a country that has long been a leader in the electric vehicle transition is discovering that EVs may not be all they’re cracked up to be.

 

2) “The case against pet ownership” by Kenny Torrella

 

Sometimes a story you assume won’t get major readership surprises you — like David’s piece above. And then there are stories you just know from the moment they’re conceived are going to get wide, wide readership. Kenny’s feature on the ethical problems of owning pets is the latter.

 

Given how many pet owners there are in the US and how much they care about their pets, I had no doubt that a story titled “the case against pet ownership” would do big numbers. But what made Kenny’s story so great — an example of authentic virality — is the care and passion he, a dog owner himself, applied to the subject.

 

3) “How a shipping error 100 years ago launched the $30 billion chicken industry” by Kenny Torrella 

 

I’ll let you in on a little editorial secret. One way to goose your numbers is to try to peg your story to a major event — and there’s no event more major in the US than Super Bowl Sunday, when Americans eat nearly 1.5 billion chicken wings, as Kenny points out in his piece.

 

But while the timing with the Super Bowl certainly helped, this story was widely read because Kenny was able to uncover the surprising history of our multibillion-dollar industrial chicken industry. That story involves a single farm in Delaware, a weird shipping accident, and even a mysterious death caused by an exploding boat. But more than that, Kenny showed us how an industry that chews through 70 billion chickens a year globally was born, and how it grew and grew.

 

4) “Meditation is more than either stress relief or enlightenment” by Oshan Jarow 

 

Oshan was one of three Future Perfect reporting fellows when he wrote this in the summer of 2023 — and you can see why we made the decision to bring him on board full time. This article provides a view of modern meditation from the inside out, exploring how a fusion of ancient traditions and contemporary science may be able to unlock the benefits of meditation for the masses. I particularly loved the way Oshan connected meditation to one of the biggest challenges facing humanity today, one that is becoming increasingly important for us at Future Perfect: the mental health crisis.

 

5) “The first results from the world’s biggest basic income experiment” by Dylan Matthews

This one made me smile. Top 10 list aside, mass readership isn’t really our focus at Future Perfect. Part of the reason we’re grant-supported is that you don’t generally expect coverage on subjects that are by definition not what the media usually covers to put up big audience numbers. And yet, here is Dylan, who helped found Future Perfect, reporting on the surprising results of the world’s largest test on basic income in Kenya — and it’s our fifth most read story of the year. That’s why I love our audience.

 

6) “‘Cry baby scientist’: What Oppenheimer the film gets wrong about Oppenheimer the man” by Haydn Belfield

 

I started editing this freelance story from University of Cambridge existential risk expert Haydn Belfield about 30 minutes after I emerged, utterly dazed, from a 9:30 am first-day showing of Oppenheimer. And as soon as I was done reading it, I rushed to finish it and publish as soon as I could, because I knew that the millions of people who were watching the Oppenheimer half of Barbenheimer that weekend needed to know about the dark and weird side of the film’s immensely privileged hero. What a great counternarrative to Christopher Nolan’s Byronic tale of a scientist done wrong. My favorite line: “Once after a crash of Oppenheimer’s own, speeding in his Chrysler while racing a train and knocking unconscious and almost killing his passenger Natalie Raymond, his dad gave her a Cezanne drawing by way of an apology. Hot dog!” Hot dog indeed.

 

7) “The new scientific review on masks and Covid isn’t what you think” by Kelsey Piper

 

You have your takes, and your contrarian takes, but what Kelsey pulls off here is the rare counter-contrarian take. First, the assumption was that masks were an important way to stem the spread of Covid-19. But then came the Cochrane review, a seemingly gold-standard meta-analysis that crunched the data and seemed to conclude that no, actually they apparently made no difference at all.

 

But as Kelsey carefully described, there were significant problems with how the meta-analysis was conducted and which studies it was drawing from, which meant that such conclusions were far too sweeping. It’s a perfect example of something Kelsey excels at: the scientific study of science itself.

 

8) “The Aubrey Plaza ad for Big Dairy that may have violated federal law, explained” by Kenny Torrella

 

Sometimes the headline really does say it all. Here was indie comedy darling Aubrey Plaza, shilling for Big Dairy in a commercial for a fake plant-based dairy product called Wood Milk. There’s a vibrant media subgenre in pointing out when celebrities do something wrong on the internet, but Kenny went beyond the easy mockery to show how the ad — which, yes, really did seem to skirt federal law — was just the latest salvo in an ongoing war between Big Dairy and the plant-based products trying to supplant it. Personally, I’ll never look at Parks and Recreation the same way again.

 

9) “23 things we think will happen in 2023” by Future Perfect staff 

 

You know something I learned in 2023? You all really, really like it when we try to predict the future. I’ve got good news — you can catch our new batch of predictions for 2024 at the start of the year. I only wish my prediction for the Super Bowl last year had done as well as this story.

 

10) “The viral story of a girl and her goat explains how the meat industry indoctrinates children” by Gabriel Rosenberg and Jan Dutkiewicz

 

 I’m very happy to see how many animal welfare stories made it on our most read list. Of all the subjects we cover, the effort to change a factory farming system that tortures and kills tens of billions of animals a year is the one that faces the longest odds. It can often feel as if nothing can help, as if progress here is doomed.

 

Yet the fact that so many people read about Gabriel and Jan’s story on the scandalous experience of a young girl who came to adore the goat she was raising for a 4-H project, only to have the animal forcibly taken from her by county sheriffs, gives me a little bit of hope for the new year.

—Bryan Walsh, editorial director

 

P.S. If you want to recommend this newsletter to your friends or colleagues, tell them to sign up at vox.com/future-perfect-newsletter.

 
 
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
 

A historian’s advice to the Democrats trying to build stuff

Magdel Ngan/AFP via Getty Images

These days, political leaders and commentators talk often about “industrial policy” and stimulating supply in the economy, rather than just demand. Senior policy reporter Rachel Cohen talked with historian Brent Cebul, author of Illusions of Progress, a book that traces earlier iterations of “supply-side liberalism” throughout the 20th century. Read their conversation about how Democrats who are interested in leveraging markets might avoid some of the mistakes of the past.

More on this topic from Vox:

  • So it’s come to this: We might have to worry about the deficit
  • We're fighting poverty all wrong
  • You can’t even pay people to have more kids
 

Indigenous activists are risking their lives for butterflies

Karlotta Freier for Vox

To protect the forests of central Mexico  — one of the few remaining wintering refuges for migrating monarchs — against cartel-backed logging, the local Mazahua Indigenous community in Crescencio Morales has established its own security force. Writer Anjan Sundaram spoke with community members about how climate change is making environmental protection more dangerous.

 

More on this topic from Vox:

  • The future of the planet hinges on understanding these 5 key phrases
  • How to detox coal country
  • In Malawi, a blueprint for recovery from climate disaster
 
WHAT WE'RE THINKING ABOUT

Mike Coppola/Getty Images for TIME

The boardroom drama at OpenAI last month overshadowed what I consider to be the most important work the company is doing right now: its “superalignment” agenda, meant to develop tools that will enable humans to safely control AIs that are smarter than humans. In some ways, this seems like a wild, hubristic goal, like an orangutan trying to come up with a way to conquer the homo sapiens. But Will Knight at Wired has a nice piece explaining that the superalignment team is starting small by trying to train a weak AI (GPT-2) to control a stronger one (GPT-4) as an analogy for what humans will eventually have to do. —Dylan Matthews, senior correspondent

 

A whole slew of you are probably going to be watching Christmas classics like The Holiday, Elf, or Die Hard next week. I respect that. But maybe consider a new tradition. I love watching movies that are camp, and what’s more camp than the 1996 version of Romeo and Juliet, starring a young Leonardo DiCaprio? Picture this: You’re at home with a cup of hot cocoa, and then BAM! There’s Leo in a Hawaiian shirt, reciting Shakespeare. Arguably a perfect experience. —Izzie Ramirez, deputy editor

 

Two years ago, I wrote a story about the nativism of the concept of invasive species (Bryan also wrote a great piece on this recently), and people on Twitter got very mad at me. But an increasing number of scientists and environmental philosophers are thinking this way. In this intriguing new paper, philosopher Pablo Castelló and conservationist Francisco Santiago-Ávila argue against the traditional conservation biology framework that prioritizes native species at the expense of non-natives. They propose instead a “pluralist ethic that foregrounds self-determination, community, and social relationships; rejects human dominion over animals; and emphasizes protective, preventive, and non-harmful interventions.” —Marina Bolotnikova, deputy editor


If you have a spare three or four hours this holiday season, it’s worth reading former New York Times opinion editor James Bennet’s 17,000-word (!) essay on why he is no longer the New York Times opinion editor. Yes, there’s a lot of intra-media stuff in here, usually of the particularly virulent strain that is intra-Times media stuff. But what happened to Bennet, who was forced to resign in June 2020 after a staff revolt over an op-ed, and how he processed it provides an illuminating picture of how the media has changed in recent years — for better and for worse. —Bryan Walsh, editorial director  

Questions? Comments? Tell us what you think! Email us at futureperfect@vox.com. 

 
Learn more about RevenueStripe...
 
FacebookTwitterYouTube

Access the web version of this newsletter here.

 

This email was sent to comercialyventas.aliperiodicos@blogger.com. Manage your email preferences or unsubscribe. If you value Vox’s unique explanatory journalism, support our work with a one-time or recurring contribution.

 

View our Privacy Notice and our Terms of Service.

 

Vox Media, 1201 Connecticut Ave. NW, Floor 12, Washington, DC 20036.
Copyright © 2023. All rights reserved.